REVIEW 1 cited by
It is time for Factor Graph Optimization for GNSS/INS Integration: Comparison between FGO and EKF
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The recently proposed factor graph optimization (FGO) is adopted to integrate GNSS/INS attracted lots of attention and improved the performance over the existing EKF-based GNSS/INS integrations. However, a comprehensive comparison of those two GNSS/INS integration schemes in the urban canyon is not available. Moreover, the performance of the FGO-based GNSS/INS integration rely heavily on the size of the window of optimization. Effectively tuning the window size is still an open question. To fill this gap, this paper evaluates both loosely and tightly-coupled integrations using both EKF and FGO via the challenging dataset collected in the urban canyon. The detailed analysis of the results for the advantages of the FGO is also given in this paper by degenerating the FGO-based estimator to an EKF like estimator. More importantly, we analyze the effects of window size against the performance of FGO, by considering both the GNSS pseudorange error distribution and environmental conditions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PC-DeepNet: A GNSS Positioning Error Minimization Framework Using Permutation-Invariant Deep Neural Network
PC-DeepNet trains a sum-pooling permutation-invariant network on seven GNSS features to predict position corrections, reporting improved urban and suburban accuracy with fewer parameters than prior learning-based methods.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.