Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Validation of the rapid detection approach for enhancing the electronic nose systems performance, using different deep learning models and support vector machines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.01611 v1 pith:7674TLBO submitted 2020-05-04 eess.SP

classification eess.SP
keywords differentapproachmodelsdetectione-noserapidtimeclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-time gas classification is an essential issue and challenge in applications such as food and beverage quality control, accident prevention in industrial environments, for instance. In recent years, the Deep Learning (DL) models have shown great potential to classify and forecast data in diverse problems, even in the electronic nose (E-Nose) field. In this work, we used a Support Vector Machines (SVM) algorithm and three different DL models to validate the rapid detection approach (based on processing an early portion of raw signals and a rising window protocol) over different measurement conditions. We performed a set of trials with five different E-Nose databases that include fifteen datasets. Based on the results, we concluded that the proposed approach has a high potential, and it can be suitable to be used for E-nose technologies, reducing the necessary time for making forecasts and accelerating the response time. Because in most cases, it achieved reliable estimates using only the first 30% or fewer of measurement data (counted after the gas injection starts.) The findings suggest that the rapid detection approach generates reliable forecasting models using different classification methods. Still, SVM seems to obtain the best accuracy, right window size, and better training time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools