Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Delay-Constrained Topology-Transparent Distributed Scheduling for MANETs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.07668 v6 pith:2Y3JX6Q7 submitted 2020-06-13 cs.NI

classification cs.NI
keywords manetsnetworksschemeschemesdelay-constraineddistributedschedulingsequence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transparent topology is common in many mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) such as vehicle ad hoc networks (VANETs), unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) ad hoc networks, and wireless sensor networks due to their decentralization and mobility nature. There are many existing works on distributed scheduling scheme design for topology-transparent MANETs. Most of them focus on delay-unconstrained settings. However, with the proliferation of real-time applications over wireless communications, it becomes more and more important to support delay-constrained traffic in MANETs. In such applications, each packet has a given hard deadline: if it is not delivered before its deadline, its validity will expire and it will be removed from the system. This feature is fundamentally different from the traditional delay-unconstrained one. In this paper, we for the first time investigate distributed scheduling schemes for a topology-transparent MANET to support delay-constrained traffic. We analyze and compare probabilistic ALOHA scheme and deterministic sequence schemes, including the conventional time division multiple access (TDMA), the Galois field (GF) sequence scheme proposed in \cite{chlamtac1994making}, and the combination sequence scheme that we propose for a special type of sparse network topology.We use both theoretical analysis and empirical simulations to compare all these schemes and summarize the conditions under which different individual schemes perform best.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools