REVIEW 2 cited by
Liquidity Provider Returns in Geometric Mean Markets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Geometric mean market makers (G3Ms), such as Uniswap and Balancer, comprise a popular class of automated market makers (AMMs) defined by the following rule: the reserves of the AMM before and after each trade must have the same (weighted) geometric mean. This paper extends several results known for constant-weight G3Ms to the general case of G3Ms with time-varying and potentially stochastic weights. These results include the returns and no-arbitrage prices of liquidity pool (LP) shares that investors receive for supplying liquidity to G3Ms. Using these expressions, we show how to create G3Ms whose LP shares replicate the payoffs of financial derivatives. The resulting hedges are model-independent and exact for derivative contracts whose payoff functions satisfy an elasticity constraint. These strategies allow LP shares to replicate various trading strategies and financial contracts, including standard options. G3Ms are thus shown to be capable of recreating a variety of active trading strategies through passive positions in LP shares.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Designing funding rates for perpetual futures in cryptocurrency markets
A funding rate makes a perpetual future uniquely track any target price, with an explicit error bound for the 8-hour averaging window.
-
Split the Yield, Share the Risk: Pricing, Hedging and Fixed rates in DeFi
A formal model prices DeFi yield tokens as discounted expected future yield and proposes utility-based market makers and a fixed-rate lending design on top.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.