REVIEW 1 cited by
Tolerance versus synaptic noise in dense associative memories
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The retrieval capabilities of associative neural networks can be impaired by different kinds of noise: the fast noise (which makes neurons more prone to failure), the slow noise (stemming from interference among stored memories), and synaptic noise (due to possible flaws during the learning or the storing stage). In this work we consider dense associative neural networks, where neurons can interact in $p$-plets, in the absence of fast noise, and we investigate the interplay of slow and synaptic noise. In particular, leveraging on the duality between associative neural networks and restricted Boltzmann machines, we analyze the effect of corrupted information, imperfect learning and storing errors. For $p=2$ (corresponding to the Hopfield model) any source of synaptic noise breaks-down retrieval if the number of memories $K$ scales as the network size. For $p>2$, in the relatively low-load regime $K \sim N$, synaptic noise is tolerated up to a certain bound, depending on the density of the structure.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Hopfield Networks as Models of Emergent Function in Biology
A review article that explains Hopfield network mathematics and interprets the dynamics as signal retrieval, subspace projection, and energy landscape descent, then surveys applications to cell fate, self-assembly, an...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.