REVIEW 1 cited by
Volatility model calibration with neural networks a comparison between direct and indirect methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In a recent paper "Deep Learning Volatility" a fast 2-step deep calibration algorithm for rough volatility models was proposed: in the first step the time consuming mapping from the model parameter to the implied volatilities is learned by a neural network and in the second step standard solver techniques are used to find the best model parameter. In our paper we compare these results with an alternative direct approach where the the mapping from market implied volatilities to model parameters is approximated by the neural network, without the need for an extra solver step. Using a whitening procedure and a projection of the target parameter to [0,1], in order to be able to use a sigmoid type output function we found that the direct approach outperforms the two-step one for the data sets and methods published in "Deep Learning Volatility". For our implementation we use the open source tensorflow 2 library. The paper should be understood as a technical comparison of neural network techniques and not as an methodically new Ansatz.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Deep learning interpretability for rough volatility
A neural network trained to invert rough Heston parameters from implied volatility surfaces relies most on short-maturity deep in-the-money prices, a pattern absent in the standard Heston model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.