Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Volatility model calibration with neural networks a comparison between direct and indirect methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.03494 v1 pith:DT7PK3WS submitted 2020-07-07 q-fin.CP q-fin.MF

classification q-fin.CPq-fin.MF
keywords modelneuralstepvolatilitydeepdirectnetworkparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In a recent paper "Deep Learning Volatility" a fast 2-step deep calibration algorithm for rough volatility models was proposed: in the first step the time consuming mapping from the model parameter to the implied volatilities is learned by a neural network and in the second step standard solver techniques are used to find the best model parameter. In our paper we compare these results with an alternative direct approach where the the mapping from market implied volatilities to model parameters is approximated by the neural network, without the need for an extra solver step. Using a whitening procedure and a projection of the target parameter to [0,1], in order to be able to use a sigmoid type output function we found that the direct approach outperforms the two-step one for the data sets and methods published in "Deep Learning Volatility". For our implementation we use the open source tensorflow 2 library. The paper should be understood as a technical comparison of neural network techniques and not as an methodically new Ansatz.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deep learning interpretability for rough volatility

    q-fin.CP 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A neural network trained to invert rough Heston parameters from implied volatility surfaces relies most on short-maturity deep in-the-money prices, a pattern absent in the standard Heston model.

Pith tools