Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

XAlgo: a Design Probe of Explaining Algorithms' Internal States via Question-Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.07407 v2 pith:L3EQJYTM submitted 2020-07-14 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords algorithmsxalgodesigninternalstatesusersalgorithmlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Algorithms often appear as 'black boxes' to non-expert users. While prior work focuses on explainable representations and expert-oriented exploration, we propose and study an interactive approach using question answering to explain deterministic algorithms to non-expert users who need to understand the algorithms' internal states (e.g., students learning algorithms, operators monitoring robots, admins troubleshooting network routing). We construct XAlgo -- a formal model that first classifies the type of question based on a taxonomy and generates an answer based on a set of rules that extract information from representations of an algorithm's internal states, e.g., the pseudocode. A design probe in an algorithm learning scenario with 18 participants (9 for a Wizard-of-Oz XAlgo and 9 as a control group) reports findings and design implications based on what kinds of questions people ask, how well XAlgo responds, and what remain as challenges to bridge users' gulf of understanding algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explainable AI the Latest Advancements and New Trends

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of explainable AI methods and a speculative proposal that meta-reasoning in reward space can explain AI decisions.

Pith tools