Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Constructing Span Categories From Categories Without Pullbacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.07752 v2 pith:VB2XYDIF submitted 2020-07-15 math.CT

classification math.CT
keywords mathscrspanmathcalcategoriespullbackssystemscategoryframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Span categories provide an abstract framework for formalizing mathematical models of certain systems. The mathematical descriptions of some systems, such as classical mechanical systems, require categories that do not have pullbacks, and this limits the utility of span categories as a formal framework. Given categories $\mathscr{C}$ and $\mathscr{C}^\prime$ and a functor $\mathcal F$ from $\mathscr{C}$ to $\mathscr{C}^\prime$, we introduce the notion of an $\mathcal F$ pullback of a cospan in $\mathscr{C}$, as well as the notion of span tightness of $\mathcal F$. If $\mathcal F$ is span tight, then we can form a generalized span category ${\rm Span}(\mathscr{C},\mathcal F)$ and circumvent the technical difficulty of $\mathscr{C}$ failing to have pullbacks. Composition in ${\rm Span}(\mathscr{C},\mathcal F)$ uses $\mathcal F$-pullbacks rather than pullbacks and in this way differs from the category ${\rm Span}(\mathscr{C})$, but reduces to it when both $\mathscr{C}$ has pullbacks and $\mathcal F$ is the identity functor.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A compositional framework for open classical kinematic systems

    math-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Open kinematic systems are modeled as morphisms in a category Kin(F), and universal joints and sliding hinges are proved to require at least three actors, hence are not lower kinematic pairs.

Pith tools