REVIEW 1 cited by
The EFT Likelihood for Large-Scale Structure in Redshift Space
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We study the EFT likelihood for biased tracers in redshift space, for which the bias expansion of the galaxy velocity field $\mathbf{v}_g$ plays a fundamental role. The equivalence principle forbids stochastic contributions to $\mathbf{v}_g$ to survive at small $k$. Therefore, at leading order in derivatives the form of the likelihood ${\cal P}[\tilde{\delta}_g|\delta,\!\mathbf{v}]$ to observe a redshift-space galaxy overdensity $\tilde{\delta}_g(\tilde{\mathbf{x}})$ given a rest-frame matter and velocity fields $\delta(\mathbf{x})$, $\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{x})$ is fixed by the rest-frame noise. If this noise is Gaussian with constant power spectrum, ${\cal P}[\tilde{\delta}_g|\delta,\!\mathbf{v}]$ is also a Gaussian in the difference between $\tilde{\delta}_g(\tilde{\mathbf{x}})$ and its bias expansion: redshift-space distortions only make the covariance depend on $\delta(\mathbf{x})$ and $\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{x})$. We then show how to match this result to perturbation theory, and that one can consistently neglect the field-dependent covariance if the bias expansion is stopped at second order in perturbations. We discuss qualitatively how this affects numerical implementations of the EFT-based forward modeling, and how the picture changes when the survey window function is taken into account.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation
Galaxy stochasticity in EFT of large-scale structure reduces to nonlinear couplings of one Gaussian noise field, yielding a samplable field-level likelihood that stabilizes the inferred noise amplitude.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.