REVIEW 1 cited by
Multiplex Graph Association Rules for Link Prediction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Multiplex networks allow us to study a variety of complex systems where nodes connect to each other in multiple ways, for example friend, family, and co-worker relations in social networks. Link prediction is the branch of network analysis allowing us to forecast the future status of a network: which new connections are the most likely to appear in the future? In multiplex link prediction we also ask: of which type? Because this last question is unanswerable with classical link prediction, here we investigate the use of graph association rules to inform multiplex link prediction. We derive such rules by identifying all frequent patterns in a network via multiplex graph mining, and then score each unobserved link's likelihood by finding the occurrences of each rule in the original network. Association rules add new abilities to multiplex link prediction: to predict new node arrivals, to consider higher order structures with four or more nodes, and to be memory efficient. In our experiments, we show that, exploiting graph association rules, we are able to achieve a prediction performance close to an ideal ensemble classifier. Further, we perform a case study on a signed multiplex network, showing how graph association rules can provide valuable insights to extend social balance theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Inference of Edge Correlations in Multilayer Networks
Correlated multilayer stochastic block models, with maximum-likelihood parameter estimates, improve edge prediction over monolayer baselines when interlayer edge correlations are present.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.