Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Constructing a More Closely Matched Control Group in a Difference-in-Differences Analysis: Its Effect on History Interacting with Group Bias

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.06935 v1 pith:D6BJ4QDH submitted 2020-09-15 stat.ME stat.AP

classification stat.MEstat.AP
keywords groupcontrolanalysisdifference-in-differenceseffectbiascloselyeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Difference-in-differences analysis with a control group that differs considerably from a treated group is vulnerable to bias from historical events that have different effects on the groups. Constructing a more closely matched control group by matching a subset of the overall control group to the treated group may result in less bias. We study this phenomenon in simulation studies. We study the effect of mountaintop removal mining (MRM) on mortality using a difference-in-differences analysis that makes use of the increase in MRM following the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. For a difference-in-differences analysis of the effect of MRM on mortality, we constructed a more closely matched control group and found a 95\% confidence interval that contains substantial adverse effects along with no effect and small beneficial effects.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools