Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Embedding-based Zero-shot Retrieval through Query Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.10270 v1 pith:PHVX77AQ submitted 2020-09-22 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords retrievaldatamodelqueryalgorithmsbm25datasetsembedding-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Passage retrieval addresses the problem of locating relevant passages, usually from a large corpus, given a query. In practice, lexical term-matching algorithms like BM25 are popular choices for retrieval owing to their efficiency. However, term-based matching algorithms often miss relevant passages that have no lexical overlap with the query and cannot be finetuned to downstream datasets. In this work, we consider the embedding-based two-tower architecture as our neural retrieval model. Since labeled data can be scarce and because neural retrieval models require vast amounts of data to train, we propose a novel method for generating synthetic training data for retrieval. Our system produces remarkable results, significantly outperforming BM25 on 5 out of 6 datasets tested, by an average of 2.45 points for Recall@1. In some cases, our model trained on synthetic data can even outperform the same model trained on real data

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conventional Contrastive Learning Often Falls Short: Improving Dense Retrieval with Cross-Encoder Listwise Distillation and Synthetic Data

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Contrastive fine-tuning often degrades strong dense retrievers, while combining cross-encoder listwise distillation with diverse synthetic queries consistently improves them.

  2. Improving Scientific Document Retrieval with Academic Concept Index

    cs.IR 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Academic concept indexes that track which concepts remain uncovered make LLM-generated training queries and document snippets more effective for scientific retrieval.

Pith tools