REVIEW 1 cited by
GW190521 from the Merger of Ultra-Dwarf Galaxies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present an alternative formation scenario for the gravitational wave event GW190521, that can be explained as the merger of central black holes from two ultra-dwarf galaxies of stellar mass $\sim 10^5-10^6 ~M_\odot$, which had themselves previously undergone a merger. The GW190521 components' masses of $85^{+21}_{-14}M_\odot$ and $66^{+17}_{-18}M_\odot$ challenge standard stellar evolution models, as they fall in the so-called mass gap. We demonstrate that the merger history of ultra-dwarf galaxies at high redshifts ($1\lesssim z \lesssim 2$) matches well the LIGO/Virgo inferred merger rate for black holes within the mass range of the GW190521 components, resulting in a likely time delay of $\lesssim 4$ Gyr considering the redshift of this event. We further demonstrate that the predicted time-scales are consistent with expectations for central black hole mergers, although with large uncertainties due to the lack of high-resolution simulations in low-mass dwarf galaxies. Our findings show that this black hole production and merging channel is viable and extremely interesting as a new way to explore galaxies' black hole seeds and galaxy formation. We recommend this scenario be investigated in detail with simulations and observations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Gravitational wave inference of star cluster properties from intermediate-mass black hole mergers
Single intermediate-mass black hole mergers detected by next-generation observatories cannot pin down progenitor cluster mass or radius because of model degeneracy, but formation redshift posteriors are narrow enough ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.