Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.03240 v2 pith:H55FO2MS submitted 2020-10-07 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords biasbiasesdatadebiasingrecommendationresearchsurveyuser
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While recent years have witnessed a rapid growth of research papers on recommender system (RS), most of the papers focus on inventing machine learning models to better fit user behavior data. However, user behavior data is observational rather than experimental. This makes various biases widely exist in the data, including but not limited to selection bias, position bias, exposure bias, and popularity bias. Blindly fitting the data without considering the inherent biases will result in many serious issues, e.g., the discrepancy between offline evaluation and online metrics, hurting user satisfaction and trust on the recommendation service, etc. To transform the large volume of research models into practical improvements, it is highly urgent to explore the impacts of the biases and perform debiasing when necessary. When reviewing the papers that consider biases in RS, we find that, to our surprise, the studies are rather fragmented and lack a systematic organization. The terminology ``bias'' is widely used in the literature, but its definition is usually vague and even inconsistent across papers. This motivates us to provide a systematic survey of existing work on RS biases. In this paper, we first summarize seven types of biases in recommendation, along with their definitions and characteristics. We then provide a taxonomy to position and organize the existing work on recommendation debiasing. Finally, we identify some open challenges and envision some future directions, with the hope of inspiring more research work on this important yet less investigated topic. The summary of debiasing methods reviewed in this survey can be found at \url{https://github.com/jiawei-chen/RecDebiasing}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Real-Time Hard Negative Sampling via LLM-based Clustering for Large-Scale Two-Tower Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cluster-based real-time out-of-batch negatives drawn from LLM media embeddings outperform industry-standard negative sampling for two-tower retrieval and cut popularity bias.

  2. MCLMR: A Model-Agnostic Causal Learning Framework for Multi-Behavior Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A model-agnostic causal plug-in improves multi-behavior recommenders via backdoor adjustment on user/item bias proxies, MoE aggregation of auxiliaries, and bias-aware contrastive alignment.

  3. MERIT: A Merchant Incentive Ranking Model for Hotel Search & Ranking

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MERIT adds a monotonic merchant-quality tower and a stratified pairwise loss to a hotel ranking model, improving merchant quality scores by 3.02% in an online A/B test.

  4. Radial Neighborhood Smoothing Recommender System

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The proposed Radial Neighborhood Estimator uses SVD-based distance estimation with a variance correction and kernel smoothing over radial neighbors, but the consistency theorems are not supported by the supplied proofs.

Pith tools