Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Did You Get The Gist Of It? Understanding How Visualization Impacts Decision-Making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.04096 v1 pith:RH7AFY67 submitted 2020-10-08 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords visualizationdecision-makingdecisionresearchersunderstandingadvocatebehindbridge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As visualization researchers evaluate the impact of visualization design on decision-making, they often hold a one-dimensional perspective on the cognitive processes behind making a decision. Several psychological and economical researchers have shown that to make decisions, people rely on quantitative reasoning as well as gist-based intuition -- two systems that operate in parallel. In this position paper, we discuss decision theories and provide suggestions to bridge the gap between the evaluation of decision-making in visualization and psychology research. The goal is to question the limits of our knowledge and to advocate for a more nuanced understanding of decision-making with visualization.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?

    cs.DL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Male first authors have higher retraction rates than female first authors after accounting for publication volume, and the gap is concentrated in misconduct categories rather than honest mistakes.

Pith tools