Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LANNS: A Web-Scale Approximate Nearest Neighbor Lookup System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.09426 v1 pith:XWQJPYMU submitted 2020-10-19 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords nearestneighborapproximatesearchdatasetshighlannslarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Nearest neighbor search (NNS) has a wide range of applications in information retrieval, computer vision, machine learning, databases, and other areas. Existing state-of-the-art algorithm for nearest neighbor search, Hierarchical Navigable Small World Networks(HNSW), is unable to scale to large datasets of 100M records in high dimensions. In this paper, we propose LANNS, an end-to-end platform for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search, which scales for web-scale datasets. Library for Large Scale Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search (LANNS) is deployed in multiple production systems for identifying topK ($100 \leq topK \leq 200$) approximate nearest neighbors with a latency of a few milliseconds per query, high throughput of 2.5k Queries Per Second (QPS) on a single node, on large ($\sim$180M data points) high dimensional (50-2048 dimensional) datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DARTH: Declarative Recall Through Early Termination for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search

    cs.DB 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    DARTH learns to predict a query's current recall during HNSW/IVF search and stops early at a user-specified target, achieving speedups up to 14.6x on HNSW and 41.8x on IVF, yet 13-15% of queries miss the target.

Pith tools