Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Contextualizing E-values for Interpretable Sensitivity to Unmeasured Confounding Analyses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.07030 v1 pith:GIPYR24K submitted 2020-11-13 stat.ME stat.AP

classification stat.MEstat.AP
keywords observedconfoundinge-valuee-valuessensitivityunmeasuredanalysisbias
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and observational studies is inherently limited by the potential for unmeasured confounding. Researchers should present a quantified sensitivity to unmeasured confounding analysis that is contextualized by the study's observed covariates. VanderWeele and Ding's E-value provides an easily calculated metric for the magnitude of the hypothetical unmeasured confounding required to render the study's result inconclusive. We propose the Observed Covariate E-value to contextualize the sensitivity analysis' hypothetical E-value within the actual impact of observed covariates, individually or within groups. We introduce a sensitivity analysis figure that presents the Observed Covariate E-values, on the E-value scale, next to their corresponding observed bias effects, on the original scale of the study results. This observed bias plot allows easy comparison of the hypothetical E-values, Observed Covariate E-values, and observed bias effects. We illustrate the methods with a specific example and provide a supplemental appendix with modifiable code that teaches how to implement the method and create a publication quality figure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools