Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Informal physics programs as communities of practice: How can program structures support university students' identities?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.03022 v1 pith:6YN32LZP submitted 2020-12-05 physics.ed-ph

classification physics.ed-ph
keywords physicsprogramsidentitiesinformalcommunitiesdevelopmentidentitypractice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Many undergraduate and graduate physics students participate in some form of public engagement throughout the course of their studies, often through groups supported by physics departments and universities. These informal teaching and learning programs can offer unique opportunities for physics identity development. Understanding how physics identities can be fostered will allow us to work toward a field that is inclusive of more identities. In this study, we build on previous work to investigate student-facilitator experiences in three informal physics programs using an operationalized Communities of Practice framework. Through our analysis, we identify different structures within these programs that support physics identity development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Informal Education is Essential to Physics: Findings of the 2024 JNIPER Summit and Recommendations for Action

    physics.ed-ph 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper calls for a cultural shift in physics to recognize informal physics education as a core disciplinary practice, and it provides a structured set of recommendations across three levers and four levels of action.

Pith tools