Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Constructing trading strategy ensembles by classifying market states

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.03078 v1 pith:DGBW7TAI submitted 2020-12-05 q-fin.TR

classification q-fin.TR
keywords marketfeatureslabelsreturnsensemblesfutureonlystate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Rather than directly predicting future prices or returns, we follow a more recent trend in asset management and classify the state of a market based on labels. We use numerous standard labels and even construct our own ones. The labels rely on future data to be calculated, and can be used a target for training a market state classifier using an appropriate set of market features, e.g. moving averages. The construction of those features relies on their label separation power. Only a set of reasonable distinct features can approximate the labels. For each label we use a specific neural network to classify the state using the market features from our feature space. Each classifier gives a probability to buy or to sell and combining all their recommendations (here only done in a linear way) results in what we call a trading strategy. There are many such strategies and some of them are somewhat dubious and misleading. We construct our own metric based on past returns but penalising for a low number of transactions or small capital involvement. Only top score-performance-wise trading strategies end up in final ensembles. Using the Bitcoin market we show that the strategy ensembles outperform both in returns and risk-adjusted returns in the out-of-sample period. Even more so we demonstrate that there is a clear correlation between the success achieved in the past (if measured in our custom metric) and the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analyzing public sentiment to gauge key stock events and determine volatility in conjunction with time and options premiums

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A claim that LightGBM plus social sentiment predicts stock direction around earnings with 70.1 percent accuracy is undermined by unspecified labels, potential look-ahead bias, and no released artifacts.

Pith tools