REVIEW
Distance Estimation for BLE-based Contact Tracing -- A Measurement Study
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Mobile contact tracing apps are -- in principle -- a perfect aid to condemn the human-to-human spread of an infectious disease such as COVID-19 due to the wide use of smartphones worldwide. Yet, the unknown accuracy of contact estimation by wireless technologies hinders the broader use. We address this challenge by conducting a measurement study with a custom testbed to show the capabilities and limitations of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) in different scenarios. Distance estimation is based on interpreting the signal pathloss with a basic linear and a logarithmic model. Further, we compare our results with accurate ultra-wideband (UWB) distance measurements. While the results indicate that distance estimation by BLE is not accurate enough, a contact detector can detect contacts below 2.5 m with a true positive rate of 0.65 for the logarithmic and of 0.54 for the linear model. Further, the measurements reveal that multi-path signal propagation reduces the effect of body shielding and thus increases detection accuracy in indoor scenarios.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.