Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Leveraging End-to-End ASR for Endangered Language Documentation: An Empirical Study on Yolox\'ochitl Mixtec

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.10877 v3 pith:6YCNU5VD submitted 2021-01-26 eess.AS cs.SD

classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords documentationend-to-endtranscriptionbottlenecksendangeredlanguagemixtecnovice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

"Transcription bottlenecks", created by a shortage of effective human transcribers are one of the main challenges to endangered language (EL) documentation. Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has been suggested as a tool to overcome such bottlenecks. Following this suggestion, we investigated the effectiveness for EL documentation of end-to-end ASR, which unlike Hidden Markov Model ASR systems, eschews linguistic resources but is instead more dependent on large-data settings. We open source a Yolox\'ochitl Mixtec EL corpus. First, we review our method in building an end-to-end ASR system in a way that would be reproducible by the ASR community. We then propose a novice transcription correction task and demonstrate how ASR systems and novice transcribers can work together to improve EL documentation. We believe this combinatory methodology would mitigate the transcription bottleneck and transcriber shortage that hinders EL documentation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Breaking the Transcription Bottleneck: Fine-tuning ASR Models for Extremely Low-Resource Fieldwork Languages

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned MMS outperforms XLS-R on fieldwork ASR with less than one hour of training data, while XLS-R reaches parity beyond one hour.

Pith tools