Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

EUCA: the End-User-Centered Explainable AI Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.02437 v2 pith:YNLCRVTM submitted 2021-02-04 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords explanatoryformsexplainableprototypingend-user-centeredcriticaldesignend-users
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The ability to explain decisions to end-users is a necessity to deploy AI as critical decision support. Yet making AI explainable to non-technical end-users is a relatively ignored and challenging problem. To bridge the gap, we first identify twelve end-user-friendly explanatory forms that do not require technical knowledge to comprehend, including feature-, example-, and rule-based explanations. We then instantiate the explanatory forms as prototyping cards in four AI-assisted critical decision-making tasks, and conduct a user study to co-design low-fidelity prototypes with 32 layperson participants. The results confirm the relevance of using explanatory forms as building blocks of explanations, and identify their proprieties - pros, cons, applicable explanation goals, and design implications. The explanatory forms, their proprieties, and prototyping supports (including a suggested prototyping process, design templates and exemplars, and associated algorithms to actualize explanatory forms) constitute the End-User-Centered explainable AI framework EUCA, and is available at http://weinajin.github.io/end-user-xai . It serves as a practical prototyping toolkit for HCI/AI practitioners and researchers to understand user requirements and build end-user-centered explainable AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do ATCOs Need Explanations, and Why? Towards ATCO-Centered Explainable AI for Conflict Resolution Advisories

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Air traffic controllers in this interview study wanted AI explanations mainly for documentation and stakeholder communication, and rarely when they already agreed with the AI's advice.

  2. Fake News Detection After LLM Laundering: Measurement and Explanation

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM paraphrasing of fake news degrades detector performance across 17 detectors, with Pegasus evading best and a sentiment shift that BERTScore fails to capture.

Pith tools