REVIEW 1 cited by
Epistemic Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We show how important phenomena in social networks like coordination, trust and the communication of unsubstantiated information (gossip) can be modelled and understood using epistemic networks or epinets: directed graphs comprising networked agents and the key facts, statements or other kinds of propositional beliefs relevant to their actions. We use epinets to sharpen the explanatory and reach of social network analysis to situations problematic to both network-structural approaches and epistemic game theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models
Public and LLM trust failures are strategic exploits of inferential commitments in triadic sender–recipient–observer settings, addressable by commitment-tracking, interrogative, and incentive-reconstruction machines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.