Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Instrumental variables, spatial confounding and interference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.00304 v1 pith:EOJHY2II submitted 2021-02-27 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords spatialconfoundingvariablesinstrumentalinterferencetreatmentsunobservedaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Unobserved spatial confounding variables are prevalent in environmental and ecological applications where the system under study is complex and the data are often observational. Instrumental variables (IVs) are a common way to address unobserved confounding; however, the efficacy of using IVs on spatial confounding is largely unknown. This paper explores the effectiveness of IVs in this situation -- with particular attention paid to the spatial scale of the instrument. We show that, in case of spatially-dependent treatments, IVs are most effective when they vary at a finer spatial resolution than the treatment. We investigate IV performance in extensive simulations and apply the model in the example of long term trends in the air pollution and cardiovascular mortality in the United States over 1990-2010. Finally, the IV approach is also extended to the spatial interference setting, in which treatments can affect nearby responses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Estimating the Causal Effect of Redlining on Present-day Air Pollution

    stat.AP 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using a spatial latent factor causal model with 1940 census proxies, redlined neighborhoods show higher NO2 but only weak PM2.5 differences in 2010.

  2. Deep Causal Inference for Point-referenced Spatial Data with Continuous Treatments

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Neural-network spatial regression with an approximate Gaussian process estimates direct, indirect, and total causal effects for continuous treatments under spatial interference and unobserved confounding, and outperfo...

Pith tools