REVIEW 2 cited by
Instrumental variables, spatial confounding and interference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Unobserved spatial confounding variables are prevalent in environmental and ecological applications where the system under study is complex and the data are often observational. Instrumental variables (IVs) are a common way to address unobserved confounding; however, the efficacy of using IVs on spatial confounding is largely unknown. This paper explores the effectiveness of IVs in this situation -- with particular attention paid to the spatial scale of the instrument. We show that, in case of spatially-dependent treatments, IVs are most effective when they vary at a finer spatial resolution than the treatment. We investigate IV performance in extensive simulations and apply the model in the example of long term trends in the air pollution and cardiovascular mortality in the United States over 1990-2010. Finally, the IV approach is also extended to the spatial interference setting, in which treatments can affect nearby responses.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Estimating the Causal Effect of Redlining on Present-day Air Pollution
Using a spatial latent factor causal model with 1940 census proxies, redlined neighborhoods show higher NO2 but only weak PM2.5 differences in 2010.
-
Deep Causal Inference for Point-referenced Spatial Data with Continuous Treatments
Neural-network spatial regression with an approximate Gaussian process estimates direct, indirect, and total causal effects for continuous treatments under spatial interference and unobserved confounding, and outperfo...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.