REVIEW 2 cited by
Clusterability in Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The learned weights of a neural network have often been considered devoid of scrutable internal structure. In this paper, however, we look for structure in the form of clusterability: how well a network can be divided into groups of neurons with strong internal connectivity but weak external connectivity. We find that a trained neural network is typically more clusterable than randomly initialized networks, and often clusterable relative to random networks with the same distribution of weights. We also exhibit novel methods to promote clusterability in neural network training, and find that in multi-layer perceptrons they lead to more clusterable networks with little reduction in accuracy. Understanding and controlling the clusterability of neural networks will hopefully render their inner workings more interpretable to engineers by facilitating partitioning into meaningful clusters.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Studying Cross-cluster Modularity in Neural Networks
A clusterability regularizer creates strongly separated clusters in neural networks, shrinking effective circuit size by up to 90% on CIFAR-10, but it does not create task-specialized modules.
-
Evaluating Explanations: An Explanatory Virtues Framework for Mechanistic Interpretability -- The Strange Science Part I.ii
The paper introduces an Explanatory Virtues Framework and argues, via a qualitative rubric, that Compact Proofs are the most promising method for mechanistic interpretability.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.