REVIEW 1 cited by
Statistics of 700 individually studied W UMa stars
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a statistical study of the largest bibliographic compilation of stellar and orbital parameters of W UMa stars derived by light curve synthesis with Roche models. The compilation includes nearly 700 individually investigated objects from over 450 distinct publications. Almost 70% of this sample is comprised of stars observed in the last decade that have not been considered in previous statistical studies. We estimate the ages of the cataloged stars, model the distributions of their periods, mass ratios, temperatures and other quantities, and compare them with the data from CRTS, LAMOST and Gaia archives. As only a small fraction of the sample has radial velocity curves, we examine the reliability of the photometric mass ratios in totally and partially eclipsing systems and find that totally eclipsing W UMa stars with photometric mass ratios have the same parameter distributions as those with spectroscopic mass ratios. Most of the stars with reliable parameters have mass ratios below 0.5 and orbital periods shorter than 0.5 days. Stars with longer periods and temperatures above 7000 K stand out as outliers and shouldn't be labeled as W UMa binaries. The collected data is available as an online database at https://wumacat.aob.rs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Morphological classification of eclipsing binary stars using computer vision methods
Fine-tuned ResNet50 and vision transformers on polar-hexbin images classify eclipsing binaries as detached or overcontact with high accuracy on real data, but cannot reliably detect starspots.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.