REVIEW 2 cited by
On the population III binary black hole mergers beyond the pair-instability mass gap
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We perform a binary population synthesis calculation incorporating very massive population (Pop.) III stars up to 1500 $M_\odot$, and investigate the nature of binary black hole (BBH) mergers. Above the pair-instability mass gap, we find that the typical primary black hole (BH) mass is 135-340 $M_\odot$. The maximum primary BH mass is as massive as 686 $M_\odot$. The BBHs with both of their components above the mass gap have low effective inspiral spin $\sim$ 0. So far, no conclusive BBH merger beyond the mass gap has been detected, and the upper limit on the merger rate density is obtained. If the initial mass function (IMF) of Pop. III stars is simply expressed as $\xi_m(m) \propto m^{-\alpha}$ (single power law), we find that $\alpha \gtrsim 2.8$ is needed in order for the merger rate density not to exceed the upper limit. In the future, the gravitational wave detectors such as Einstein telescope and Pre-DECIGO will observe BBH mergers at high redshift. We suggest that we may be able to impose a stringent limit on the Pop. III IMF by comparing the merger rate density obtained from future observations with that derived theoretically.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Gravitational wave inference of star cluster properties from intermediate-mass black hole mergers
Single intermediate-mass black hole mergers detected by next-generation observatories cannot pin down progenitor cluster mass or radius because of model degeneracy, but formation redshift posteriors are narrow enough ...
-
January Food Benchmark (JFB): A Public Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Food Analysis
The abstract promises a food-image benchmark and a winning model, but the manuscript pages contain only a different paper on primordial black holes, leaving every benchmark claim unsubstantiated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.