Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Selection and Aggregation of Conformal Prediction Sets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.13871 v3 pith:HXTHN64J submitted 2021-04-28 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords predictionconformalselectionwidthlearningmachinemethodregion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conformal prediction is a generic methodology for finite-sample valid distribution-free prediction. This technique has garnered a lot of attention in the literature partly because it can be applied with any machine learning algorithm that provides point predictions to yield valid prediction regions. Of course, the efficiency (width/volume) of the resulting prediction region depends on the performance of the machine learning algorithm. In the context of point prediction, several techniques (such as cross-validation) exist to select one of many machine learning algorithms for better performance. In contrast, such selection techniques are seldom discussed in the context of set prediction (or prediction regions). In this paper, we consider the problem of obtaining the smallest conformal prediction region given a family of machine learning algorithms. We provide two general-purpose selection algorithms and consider coverage as well as width properties of the final prediction region. The first selection method yields the smallest width prediction region among the family of conformal prediction regions for all sample sizes but only has an approximate coverage guarantee. The second selection method has a finite sample coverage guarantee but only attains close to the smallest width. The approximate optimal width property of the second method is quantified via an oracle inequality. As an illustration, we consider the use of aggregation of non-parametric regression estimators in the split conformal method with the absolute residual conformal score.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RareCP: Regime-Aware Retrieval for Efficient Conformal Prediction

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RareCP improves interval efficiency for time series conformal prediction by retrieving and weighting regime-specific calibration examples while adapting to drift and maintaining coverage.

  2. Multiply Robust Conformal Risk Control with Coarsened Data

    math.ST 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A conformal risk control framework using efficient influence functions yields distribution-free prediction sets for outcomes trained on coarsened, missing, or censored data.

  3. Structure-Adaptive Conformal Inference for Large-Scale Out-of-Distribution Testing

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Introduces SCQ and P-TAMS for structure-adaptive conformal inference under pairwise exchangeability, claiming finite-sample FDR control for large-scale OOD testing.

Pith tools