REVIEW 5 cited by
The Origin of Parity Violation in Polarized Dust Emission and Implications for Cosmic Birefringence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recent measurements of Galactic polarized dust emission have found a nonzero $TB$ signal, a correlation between the total intensity and the $B$-mode polarization component. We present evidence that this parity-odd signal is driven by the relative geometry of the magnetic field and the filamentary interstellar medium in projection. Using neutral hydrogen morphology and Planck polarization data, we find that the angle between intensity structures and the plane-of-sky magnetic field orientation is predictive of the signs of Galactic $TB$ and $EB$. Our results suggest that magnetically misaligned filamentary dust structures introduce nonzero $TB$ and $EB$ correlations in the dust polarization, and that the intrinsic dust $EB$ can be predicted from measurements of dust $TB$ and $TE$ over the same sky mask. We predict correlations between $TE$, $TB$, $EB$, and $EE/BB$, and confirm our predictions using synthetic dust polarization maps from magnetohydrodynamic simulations. We introduce and measure a scale-dependent effective magnetic misalignment angle, $\psi_\ell^{dust} \sim 5^\circ$ for $100 \lesssim \ell \lesssim 500$, and predict a positive intrinsic dust $EB$ with amplitude $\left<D_\ell^{EB}\right> \lesssim 2.5~\mu\mathrm{K^2_{CMB}}$ for the same multipole range at 353 GHz over our sky mask. Both the sign and amplitude of the Galactic $EB$ signal can change with the sky area considered. Our results imply that searches for parity violation in the cosmic microwave background must account for the nonzero Galactic $EB$ and $TB$ signals, necessitating revision of existing analyses of the evidence for cosmic birefringence.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
3-form dark energy and cosmic birefringence
3-form dark energy can explain cosmic birefringence with a dimension-4 photon coupling, yielding redshift profiles that can mimic or differ from axion dark energy, but the implied photon mass estimate is numerically shaky.
-
Single Frequency CMB Foreground Removal with Inter-scale Machine Learning
A hybrid CNN using both inter-scale and multi-frequency dust correlations achieves residual B-mode foreground power 3.62e-4 in DustFilaments simulations, about 7x lower than spatial ILC.
-
Gravitational Wave Birefringence in generalized Palatini Chern Simons
Palatini f(R)+Chern–Simons gravity predicts amplitude and velocity birefringence in GW propagation, with the effect controlled by f_R and, under de-Sitter approximations, growing polynomially with redshift.
-
Planck PR4 (NPIPE) map-space cosmic birefringence
A map-space stacking analysis of Planck PR4 maps finds a CMB polarization rotation angle of about 0.46 to 0.48 degrees, dominated by instrument calibration uncertainty and consistent with no parity-violating cosmic bi...
-
Cosmic Polarisation Rotation from CMB Data: a Review for GR110
A review of CMB constraints on cosmic birefringence, reporting a possible 3 sigma hint for isotropic rotation and null anisotropic results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.