REVIEW 1 cited by
Locally Checkable Labelings with Small Messages
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
A rich line of work has been addressing the computational complexity of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), illustrating the landscape of possible complexities. In this paper, we study the landscape of LCL complexities under bandwidth restrictions. Our main results are twofold. First, we show that on trees, the CONGEST complexity of an LCL problem is asymptotically equal to its complexity in the LOCAL model. An analog statement for general (non-LCL) problems is known to be false. Second, we show that for general graphs this equivalence does not hold, by providing an LCL problem for which we show that it can be solved in $O(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, but requires $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/2})$ rounds in the CONGEST model.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
New Complexity Classes in Locally Checkable Labeling for Local Computation Algorithms
Stacking of Rosenbaum–Suomela base LCLs yields LCLs of randomized VOLUME/LCA probe complexity Θ(log^k n) and ˜Θ(n^{p/q}) on bounded-degree graphs and trees.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.