Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Locally Checkable Labelings with Small Messages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.05574 v2 pith:PRIOLL2R submitted 2021-05-12 cs.DS cs.DC

classification cs.DScs.DC
keywords complexitymodelcheckablecomplexitiescongestgenerallabelingslandscape
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A rich line of work has been addressing the computational complexity of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), illustrating the landscape of possible complexities. In this paper, we study the landscape of LCL complexities under bandwidth restrictions. Our main results are twofold. First, we show that on trees, the CONGEST complexity of an LCL problem is asymptotically equal to its complexity in the LOCAL model. An analog statement for general (non-LCL) problems is known to be false. Second, we show that for general graphs this equivalence does not hold, by providing an LCL problem for which we show that it can be solved in $O(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, but requires $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/2})$ rounds in the CONGEST model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. New Complexity Classes in Locally Checkable Labeling for Local Computation Algorithms

    cs.DC 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stacking of Rosenbaum–Suomela base LCLs yields LCLs of randomized VOLUME/LCA probe complexity Θ(log^k n) and ˜Θ(n^{p/q}) on bounded-degree graphs and trees.

Pith tools