Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Compiling Halide Programs to Push-Memory Accelerators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.12858 v1 pith:3WTVBEZC submitted 2021-05-26 cs.AR

classification cs.AR
keywords compileracceleratoracceleratorsapplicationsmemoryabstractionaddressbetter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Image processing and machine learning applications benefit tremendously from hardware acceleration, but existing compilers target either FPGAs, which sacrifice power and performance for flexible hardware, or ASICs, which rapidly become obsolete as applications change. Programmable domain-specific accelerators have emerged as a promising middle-ground between these two extremes, but such architectures have traditionally been difficult compiler targets. The main obstacle is that these accelerators often use a different memory abstraction than CPUs and GPUs: push memories that send a data stream from one computation kernel to other kernels, possibly reordered. To address the compilation challenges caused by push memories, we propose that the representation of memory in the middle and backend of the compiler be altered to combine storage with address generation and control logic in a single structure -- a unified buffer. We show that this compiler abstraction can be implemented efficiently on a programmable accelerator, and design a memory mapping algorithm that combines polyhedral analysis and software vectorization techniques to target our accelerator. Our evaluation shows that the compiler supports programmability while maintaining high performance. It can compile a wide range of image processing and machine learning applications to our accelerator with 4.7x better runtime and 4.3x better energy-efficiency as compared to an FPGA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools