REVIEW 1 cited by
Sound-to-Imagination: An Exploratory Study on Unsupervised Crossmodal Translation Using Diverse Audiovisual Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The motivation of our research is to explore the possibilities of automatic sound-to-image (S2I) translation for enabling a human receiver to visually infer the occurrence of sound related events. We expect the computer to 'imagine' the scene from the captured sound, generating original images that picture the sound emitting source. Previous studies on similar topics opted for simplified approaches using data with low content diversity and/or sound class supervision. Differently, we propose to perform unsupervised S2I translation using thousands of distinct and unknown scenes, with slightly pre-cleaned data, just enough to guarantee aural-visual semantic coherence. To that end, we employ conditional generative adversarial networks (GANs) with a deep densely connected generator. Additionally, we present a solution using informativity classifiers to perform quantitative evaluation of the generated images. This enabled us to analyze the influence of network bottleneck variation over the translation, observing a potential trade-off between informativity and pixel space convergence. Despite the complexity of the specified S2I translation task, we were able to generalize the model enough to obtain more than 14%, in average, of interpretable and semantically coherent images translated from unknown sounds.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Survey of Recent Advances and Challenges in Deep Audio-Visual Correlation Learning
A review that categorizes deep audio-visual correlation learning methods by architectures, objective functions, datasets, and evaluation metrics, and points to missing standardized benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.