Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Algorithmic market making in dealer markets with hedging and market impact

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.06974 v6 pith:3CRTUYKF submitted 2021-06-13 q-fin.TR

classification q-fin.TR
keywords marketsdealermarketdealersinventorymodelrangethey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In dealer markets, dealers provide prices at which they agree to buy and sell the assets and securities they have in their scope. With ever increasing trading volume, this quoting task has to be done algorithmically in most markets such as foreign exchange markets or corporate bond markets. Over the last ten years, many mathematical models have been designed that can be the basis of quoting algorithms in dealer markets. Nevertheless, in most (if not all) models, the dealer is a pure internalizer, setting quotes and waiting for clients. However, on many dealer markets, dealers also have access to an inter-dealer market or even public trading venues where they can hedge part of their inventory. In this paper, we propose a model taking this possibility into account, therefore allowing dealers to externalize part of their risk. The model displays an important feature well known to practitioners that within a certain inventory range the dealer internalizes the flow by appropriately adjusting the quotes and starts externalizing outside of that range. The larger the franchise, the wider is the inventory range suitable for pure internalization. The model is illustrated numerically with realistic parameters for USDCNH spot market.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Incentives and Market Structure in Intent-Based Exchanges: Evidence from a Solver-Reward Reform

    cs.CR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoW Protocol's CIP-74 reward reform concentrated large-order trading value onto incumbent solvers and dispersed small-order value, without changing average execution quality or trade-count concentration.

  2. Decoding OTC Government Bond Market Liquidity: An ABM Model for Market Dynamics

    q-fin.TR 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Sugarscape-style ABM of OTC government bond markets reports that market-maker diversity and lower costs increase simulated liquidity and stability, but the model is only validated against one calibrated aggregate statistic.

Pith tools