Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Minimal pairs, minimal fields and implicit constant fields

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.04828 v1 pith:FREPBMZX submitted 2021-07-10 math.AG math.AC

classification math.AGmath.AC
keywords fieldsminimaltranscendentaldefinitionextensionsconstantimplicitpairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Minimal pairs of definition were introduced by Alexandru, Popescu and Zaharescu to study residue transcendental extensions. In this paper we obtain analogous results in the value transcendental case. We introduce the notion of minimal fields of definition for valuation transcendental extensions and show that they share some common ramification theoretic properties. The connection between minimal fields of definition and implicit constant fields is also investigated. Further, we explore the relationship between valuation transcendental extensions and pseudo-Cauchy sequences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools