Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Revisiting the luminosity and redshift distributions of long gamma-ray bursts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.00766 v1 pith:U4EYI5XL submitted 2021-09-02 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords redshiftevolutionpower-lawswiftburstsluminosityprobabilityresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this work, we update and enlarge the long gamma-ray burst (GRB) sample detected by the {\it Swift} satellite. Given the incomplete sampling of the faint bursts and the low completeness in redshift measurement, we carefully select a subsample of bright {\it Swift} bursts to revisit the GRB luminosity function (LF) and redshift distribution by taking into account the probability of redshift measurement. Here we also explore two general expressions for the GRB LF, i.e., a broken power-law LF and a triple power-law LF. Our results suggest that a strong redshift evolution in luminosity (with an evolution index of $\delta=1.92^{+0.25}_{-0.37}$) or in density ($\delta=1.26^{+0.33}_{-0.34}$) is required in order to well account for the observations, independent of the assumed expression of the GRB LF. However, in a one-on-one comparison using the Akaike information criterion, the best-fitting evolution model involving the triple power-law LF is statistically preferred over the best-fitting one involving the broken power-law LF with a relative probability of $\sim94.3$\% versus $\sim5.7$\%. Extrapolating our fitting results to the flux limit of the whole {\it Swift} sample, and considering the trigger probability of {\it Swift}/Burst Alert Telescope in detail, we find that the expectations from our evolution models provide a good representation of the observed distributions of the whole sample without the need for any adjustment of the model free parameters. This further confirms the reliability of our analysis results.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Ray Boosted Relic Neutrinos

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Computes the diffuse UHECR-boosted CνB flux across elastic, coherent, incoherent, resonance, and deep-inelastic channels with mixed-composition UHECR models and derives upper limits on CνB overdensity from IceCube and...

  2. Tightening Bounds on Warm Dark Matter with High-Redshift Gamma-Ray Bursts

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using the redshift distribution of 118 luminous Swift GRBs, warm dark matter particles are bounded to mx ≥ 1.3 keV at 95% CL (≥3.4 keV if GRBs exactly trace the SFR).

Pith tools