Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What Matters for Ad-hoc Video Search? A Large-scale Evaluation on TRECVID

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.01774 v2 pith:IB6HWQUJ submitted 2021-09-04 cs.MM

classification cs.MM
keywords evaluationtrecvidsolutionswhatad-hoccomparisondatafeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

For quantifying progress in Ad-hoc Video Search (AVS), the annual TRECVID AVS task is an important international evaluation. Solutions submitted by the task participants vary in terms of their choices of cross-modal matching models, visual features and training data. As such, what one may conclude from the evaluation is at a high level that is insufficient to reveal the influence of the individual components. In order to bridge the gap between the current solution-level comparison and the desired component-wise comparison, we propose in this paper a large-scale and systematic evaluation on TRECVID. By selected combinations of state-of-the-art matching models, visual features and (pre-)training data, we construct a set of 25 different solutions and evaluate them on the TRECVID AVS tasks 2016--2020. The presented evaluation helps answer the key question of what matters for AVS. The resultant observations and learned lessons are also instructive for developing novel AVS solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools