Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A machine learning approach to commutative algebra: Distinguishing table vs non-table ideals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.11417 v1 pith:CTLRLCHD submitted 2021-09-23 math.AC

classification math.AC
keywords idealstablenon-tablealgebraapproachcommutativedistinguishlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a novel approach to distinguish table vs non-table ideals by using different machine learning algorithms. We introduce the reader to table ideals, assuming some knowledge on commutative algebra and describe their main properties. We create a data set containing table and non-table ideals, and we use a feedforward neural network model, a decision tree and a graph neural networks for the classification. Our results indicate that there exists an algorithm to distinguish table ideals from non-table ideals, and we prove it along some novel results on table ideals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools