REVIEW 1 cited by
Rapidly quenched galaxies in the Simba cosmological simulation and observations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
A wide range of mechanisms have been put forward to explain the quenching of star formation in galaxies with cosmic time, however, the true balance of responsible mechanisms remains unknown. The identification and study of galaxies that have shut down their star formation on different timescales might elucidate which mechanisms dominate at different epochs and masses. Here we study the population of rapidly quenched galaxies (RQGs) in the SIMBA cosmological hydrodynamic simulation at $0.5<z<2$, comparing directly to observational post-starburst galaxies in the UKIDSS Ultra Deep Survey via their colour distributions and mass functions. We find that the fraction of quiescent galaxies that are rapidly quenched in SIMBA is 59% (or 48% in terms of stellar mass), which is higher than observed. A similar "downsizing" of RQGs is observed in both SIMBA and the UDS, with RQGs at higher redshift having a higher average mass. However, SIMBA produces too many RQGs at $1<z_q<1.5$ and too few low mass RQGs at $0.5<z_q<1$. The precise colour distribution of SIMBA galaxies compared to the observations also indicates various inconsistencies in star formation and chemical enrichment histories, including an absence of short, intense starbursts. Our results will help inform the next generation of galaxy evolution models, particularly with respect to the quenching mechanisms employed.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A comparison of dust content and properties in GAMA/G10-COSMOS/3D-HST and SIMBA cosmological simulations
SIMBA simulations do not reproduce the observed dust mass distributions of dust-rich and dust-poor galaxies at z=0.5 to 1.5, likely due to galaxy population differences and resolution limits.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.