REVIEW 2 cited by
Managing Bias in Human-Annotated Data: Moving Beyond Bias Removal
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Due to the widespread use of data-powered systems in our everyday lives, the notions of bias and fairness gained significant attention among researchers and practitioners, in both industry and academia. Such issues typically emerge from the data, which comes with varying levels of quality, used to train systems. With the commercialization and employment of such systems that are sometimes delegated to make life-changing decisions, a significant effort is being made towards the identification and removal of possible sources of bias that may surface to the final end-user. In this position paper, we instead argue that bias is not something that should necessarily be removed in all cases, and the attention and effort should shift from bias removal to the identification, measurement, indexing, surfacing, and adjustment of bias, which we name bias management. We argue that if correctly managed, bias can be a resource that can be made transparent to the the users and empower them to make informed choices about their experience with the system.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Audio Texture Manipulation by Exemplar-Based Analogy
An exemplar-based analogy model that manipulates audio textures by learning transformations from paired before-and-after clips, trained self-supervised on a synthetic quadruplet dataset.
-
Video Repurposing from User Generated Content: A Large-scale Dataset and Benchmark
Repurpose-10K provides a large-scale video repurposing benchmark with user-generated clip annotations and a cross-modal baseline that outperforms temporal grounding models on this benchmark.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.