Pith. sign in

REVIEW

QA4PRF: A Question Answering based Framework for Pseudo Relevance Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.08229 v1 pith:VKHZ4NWV submitted 2021-11-16 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords querydocumentsinformationmethodsqa4prftop-retrievedexpansionframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pseudo relevance feedback (PRF) automatically performs query expansion based on top-retrieved documents to better represent the user's information need so as to improve the search results. Previous PRF methods mainly select expansion terms with high occurrence frequency in top-retrieved documents or with high semantic similarity with the original query. However, existing PRF methods hardly try to understand the content of documents, which is very important in performing effective query expansion to reveal the user's information need. In this paper, we propose a QA-based framework for PRF called QA4PRF to utilize contextual information in documents. In such a framework, we formulate PRF as a QA task, where the query and each top-retrieved document play the roles of question and context in the corresponding QA system, while the objective is to find some proper terms to expand the original query by utilizing contextual information, which are similar answers in QA task. Besides, an attention-based pointer network is built on understanding the content of top-retrieved documents and selecting the terms to represent the original query better. We also show that incorporating the traditional supervised learning methods, such as LambdaRank, to integrate PRF information will further improve the performance of QA4PRF. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that QA4PRF significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools