Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Measuring the sound horizon and absolute magnitude of SNIa by maximizing the consistency between low-redshift data sets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.15450 v4 pith:PPNZ7F2K submitted 2021-11-30 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords sniastandardcosmicdatacandlesrulerabsolutecosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The comoving sound horizon at the baryon drag epoch, $r_{d}$, encapsulates very important physical information about the pre-recombination era and serves as a cosmic standard ruler. On the other hand, the absolute magnitude of supernovae of Type Ia (SNIa), $M$, is pivotal to infer the distances to these standard candles. Having access to (at least) one of these two quantities is crucial to measure the Hubble parameter $H_0$ from BAO/SNIa data. In this work we present a new method to measure how long is the cosmic ruler and how bright are the standard candles independently from the main drivers of the $H_0$ tension, namely by avoiding (i) the use of CMB data; (ii) the calibration of SNIa in the first steps of the cosmic distance ladder; and (iii) the assumption of any concrete cosmological model. We only assume that SNIa can be safely employed as standard candles and $r_d$ as a standard ruler, together with the validity of the Cosmological Principle and the metric description of gravity, with photons propagating in null geodesics and the conservation of the photon number. Our method is based on the minimization of a loss function that represents the level of inconsistency between the low-redshift data sets employed in this study, to wit: SNIa, BAO and cosmic chronometers. In our main analysis we obtain: $r_d=(146.0^{+4.2}_{-5.1})$ Mpc, $M=-19.362^{+0.078}_{-0.067}$. The former is fully compatible with Planck's $\Lambda$CDM best-fit cosmology, but still leaves plenty of room for new physics before the decoupling, whereas our constraint on $M$ lies closer to the value preferred by the concordance model, although it is only $\sim 1.4\sigma$ below the SH0ES measurement.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 34 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. KAN-LSTM-Transformer Neural Networks, MFV and Cosmological Parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    KLT-Net reconstructs the SN Ia distance modulus non-parametrically; with MFV M_B and flat-ΛCDM Bayesian/Hessian inference it yields H0 ≈ 69.6 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ and Ωm ≈ 0.30.

  2. Crosschecking Cosmic Distances from DESI BAO and DES SNe

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For DESI DR2 BAO versus DES SNe, the comoving-distance ratio is flat but the inverse-Hubble-distance ratio falls with redshift at 2.3–2.5σ, which the authors attribute to systematics.

Pith tools