Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Prior knowledge elicitation: The past, present, and future

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.01380 v2 pith:H5TNEXBM submitted 2021-12-01 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords priorelicitationbayesianknowledgeevenlackproblemspecification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Specification of the prior distribution for a Bayesian model is a central part of the Bayesian workflow for data analysis, but it is often difficult even for statistical experts. In principle, prior elicitation transforms domain knowledge of various kinds into well-defined prior distributions, and offers a solution to the prior specification problem. In practice, however, we are still fairly far from having usable prior elicitation tools that could significantly influence the way we build probabilistic models in academia and industry. We lack elicitation methods that integrate well into the Bayesian workflow and perform elicitation efficiently in terms of costs of time and effort. We even lack a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding different facets of the prior elicitation problem. Why are we not widely using prior elicitation? We analyse the state of the art by identifying a range of key aspects of prior knowledge elicitation, from properties of the modelling task and the nature of the priors to the form of interaction with the expert. The existing prior elicitation literature is reviewed and categorized in these terms. This allows recognizing under-studied directions in prior elicitation research, finally leading to a proposal of several new avenues to improve prior elicitation methodology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sideband Spectroscopy in the Strong Driving Regime: Volcano Transparency and Sideband Anomaly

    cond-mat.other 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A strongly driven spin can emit a volcano-shaped spectrum with a transparent center and, in a nonlinear cavity, both sidebands on the same side of the centroid, as reported for P1 and NV- diamond defects.

  2. Quantifying How Much Has Been Learned from a Research Study

    stat.ME 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A study's contribution to science can be quantified as the Wasserstein-2 distance between the community's prior and posterior distributions over the effect of interest.

  3. Paradise of Forking Paths: Revisiting the Adaptive Data Analysis Problem

    stat.ME 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Pólya-tree Bayesian scheme for adaptive counting queries estimates a distribution with lower MSE than non-adaptive histograms in simulated Gaussian mixtures.

Pith tools