Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparison of Robust Kalman Filters for Improving Wheel-Inertial Odometry in Planetary Rovers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.07872 v1 pith:2ZYPBQZF submitted 2021-12-15 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords adaptivefiltersodometryrobustclassicalimprovingkalmanlocalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper compares the performance of adaptive and robust Kalman filter algorithms in improving wheel-inertial odometry on low featured rough terrain. Approaches include classical adaptive and robust methods as well as variational methods, which are evaluated experimentally on a wheeled rover in terrain similar to what would be encountered in planetary exploration. Variational filters show improved solution accuracy compared to the classical adaptive filters and are able to handle erroneous wheel odometry measurements and keep good localization for longer distances without significant drift. We also show how varying the parameters affects localization performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools