REVIEW 5 cited by
Determining the Hubble Constant without the Sound Horizon: Perspectives with Future Galaxy Surveys
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
$H_0$ constraints from galaxy surveys are sourced by the geometric properties of two standardisable rulers: the sound horizon scale, $r_s$, and the matter-radiation equality scale, $k_{\rm eq}$. While most analyses over the last decade have focused on the first scale, recent work has emphasised that the second can provide an independent source of information about the expansion rate of the universe. Recent approaches to obtain a sound-horizon-independent measurement of $H_0$ from the equality scale have avoided $r_s$-based information by removing the sound-horizon-calibrating prior on the baryon density. We present a new method to marginalise over $r_s$; this allows baryon information to be retained enabling tighter parameter constraints. For a Euclid-like spectroscopic survey, we forecast sound-horizon-independent $H_0$ constraints of $\sigma_{H_0} = 0.7\rm{\ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}$ for our method using the equality scale, compared with $\sigma_{H_0} = 0.5\rm{\ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}$ from the sound horizon. Upcoming equality scale $H_0$ measurements thus can be highly competitive, although we caution that the impact of observational systematics on such measurements still needs to be investigated in detail. Applying our new approach to the BOSS power spectrum gives $H_0 = 69.5^{+3.0}_{-3.5}\rm{\ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}$ from equality alone, somewhat tighter than previous constraints. Consistency of $r_s$- and $k_{\rm eq}$-based $H_0$ measurements can provide a valuable internal consistency test of the cosmological model; as an example, we consider the change in $H_0$ created by early dark energy. Assuming the \textit{Planck}+SH0ES best-fit EDE model we find a $2.6\sigma$ shift ($\Delta H_0 = 2.6\rm{\ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}$) between the two measurements for Euclid; if we instead assume the ACT best-fit model, this increases to $9.0\sigma$ ($\Delta H_0 = 7.8\rm{\ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}$).
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
A sound horizon independent measurement of $H_0$ from BOSS, DESI and DES Y3
Combining BOSS power spectrum and bispectrum with DESI and DES lensing data yields a sound-horizon-free H0 = 70.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc, with a 1.8σ BAO scale deviation that is scale-cut dependent.
-
Cosmology from Planck CMB Lensing and DESI DR1 Quasar Tomography
DESI DR1 quasars cross-correlated with Planck PR4 lensing give sigma8 = 0.929 and S8 = 0.922, about 1.5 sigma above Planck's LCDM prediction, and a sound-horizon-free H0 = 69.1 km/s/Mpc.
-
Can the sound horizon-free measurement of $H_0$ constrain early new physics?
Mock galaxy-survey analyses show that sound-horizon-free H0 measurements do not currently rule out BAO-compatible early dark energy models, and LambdaCDM-derived priors can bias the result.
-
Cosmology with HI Intensity Mapping
SKAO HI intensity mapping forecasts yield competitive LambdaCDM constraints (e.g. H0 to ~0.3 km/s/Mpc optimistic) via power spectrum, BAO, bispectrum and stacking, complementary to CMB and optical surveys.
-
The Hubble tension: A decade review
Pure early or late fixes to the Hubble tension are tightly constrained; remaining options are combined early-late interacting dark energy or new physics at the local-to-homogeneous transition.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.