Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Convex integration with avoidance and hyperbolic (4,6) distributions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.14632 v1 pith:FTWGRKT3 submitted 2021-12-29 math.DG math.GTmath.SG

classification math.DGmath.GTmath.SG
keywords avoidanceconvexdistributionsintegrationdifferentialrelationampleexample
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper tackles the classification, up to homotopy, of tangent distributions satisfying various non-involutivity conditions. All of our results build on Gromov's convex integration. For completeness, we first prove that that the full h-principle holds for step-2 bracket-generating distributions. This follows from classic convex integration, no refinements of the theory are needed. The classification of (3,5) and (3,6) distributions follows as a particular case. We then move on to our main example: A complete h-principle for hyperbolic (4,6) distributions. Even though the associated differential relation fails to be ample along some principal subspaces, we implement an "avoidance trick" to ensure that these are avoided during convex integration. Using this trick we provide the first example of a differential relation that is ample in coordinate directions but not in all directions, answering a question of Eliashberg and Mishachev. This so-called "avoidance trick" is part of a general avoidance framework, which is the main contribution of this article. Given any differential relation, the framework attempts to produce an associated object called an "avoidance template". If this process is successful, we say that the relation is "ample up to avoidance" and we prove that convex integration applies. The example of hyperbolic (4,6) distributions shows that our framework is capable of addressing differential relations beyond the applicability of classic convex integration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fat distributions with Reeb directions need not be complex contact

    math.GT 2026-03 reject novelty 8.0 of 10

    There exists a global fat (4,6)-distribution on R^6 that has two Reeb directions but is nowhere diffeomorphic to a complex contact structure.

Pith tools