Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A loss discounting framework for model averaging and selection in time series models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.12045 v4 pith:JTBIHMRP submitted 2022-01-28 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords modeldiscountinglossmethodologiesaveragingcombinationdifferentforecasting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a Loss Discounting Framework for model and forecast combination which generalises and combines Bayesian model synthesis and generalized Bayes methodologies. We use a loss function to score the performance of different models and introduce a multilevel discounting scheme which allows a flexible specification of the dynamics of the model weights. This novel and simple model combination approach can be easily applied to large scale model averaging/selection, can handle unusual features such as sudden regime changes, and can be tailored to different forecasting problems. We compare our method to both established methodologies and state of the art methods for a number of macroeconomic forecasting examples. We find that the proposed method offers an attractive, computationally efficient alternative to the benchmark methodologies and often outperforms more complex techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Parameter Optimization in Gaussian Processes: A Comprehensive Study of Uncertainty Quantification and Dimensional Scaling

    math.OC 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    An adaptive-kappa, uncertainty-penalized GP-UCB is claimed to outperform fixed-parameter baselines, but the supporting theory is sketched and the empirical evidence is not shipped.

Pith tools