Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An isolated mass gap black hole or neutron star detected with astrometric microlensing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.01903 v2 pith:FMQOFDGE submitted 2022-02-03 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords blackholelensmicrolensingastrometricneutroncandidatesfive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present the analysis of five black hole candidates identified from gravitational microlensing surveys. Hubble Space Telescope astrometric data and densely sampled lightcurves from ground-based microlensing surveys are fit with a single-source, single-lens microlensing model in order to measure the mass and luminosity of each lens and determine if it is a black hole. One of the five targets (OGLE-2011-BLG-0462/MOA-2011-BLG-191 or OB110462 for short) shows a significant $>1$ mas coherent astrometric shift, little to no lens flux, and has an inferred lens mass of 1.6 - 4.4 $M_\odot$. This makes OB110462 the first definitive discovery of a compact object through astrometric microlensing and it is most likely either a neutron star or a low-mass black hole. This compact object lens is relatively nearby (0.70-1.92 kpc) and has a slow transverse motion of $<$30 km/s. OB110462 shows significant tension between models well-fit to photometry vs. astrometry, making it currently difficult to distinguish between a neutron star and a black hole. Additional observations and modeling with more complex system geometries, such as binary sources are needed to resolve the puzzling nature of this object. For the remaining four candidates, the lens masses are $<2 M_\odot$ and they are unlikely to be black holes; two of the four are likely white dwarfs or neutron stars. We compare the full sample of five candidates to theoretical expectations on the number of black holes in the Milky Way ($\sim 10^8$) and find reasonable agreement given the small sample size.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A case study of GW190425 for classifying binary neutron star versus binary black hole mergers and constraining asymmetric dark matter with gravitational wave detectors

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Assuming GW190425 was a black hole merger from dark-matter-induced neutron star collapse, the authors derive dark matter constraints and forecast that only Einstein Telescope/Cosmic Explorer can confidently classify s...

  2. Stellar-Mass Black Holes

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A concise review of stellar-mass black hole physics and observations, plus a speculative interstellar mission concept.

Pith tools