Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Grassroots Currencies: Foundations for Grassroots Digital Economies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.05619 v17 pith:JKB32LQE submitted 2022-02-11 cs.MA

classification cs.MA
keywords grassrootscurrenciesprotocoldigitalratioanyonebasiccryptocurrencies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Grassroots currencies are means for turning mutual trust into liquidity, with the goal of providing foundations for grassroots digital economies. Grassroots coins are units of debt that can be issued by anyone -- people, corporations, cooperatives, banks, municipalities and governments -- and traded by anyone. They are more similar to `inside money' (a medium of exchange backed by private credit) and to fiat currencies (for which the issuer controls scarcity) than to global cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, which are unbacked and for which scarcity is controlled by the protocol. In this paper we introduce the principles that underlie grassroots currencies; show that they naturally admit basic fiat currency measures regarding foreign trade such as foreign debt, trade balance, and velocity, and basic accounting measures such as cash ratio, quick ratio, and current ratio; elaborate economic scenarios enabled by these principles for grassroots currencies issued by natural and legal persons; relate grassroots currencies to extant work, including notions of personal currencies, community currencies, cryptocurrencies, and inside money; formally specify grassroots currencies as digital entities, governed by the Grassroots Currencies Protocol; discuss the security (safety, liveness, and privacy) of the protocol; and prove that the protocol is grassroots. An implementation of grassroots currencies via a blocklace-based payment system is described elsewhere.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Volition-Guarded Multiagent Atomic Transactions: Describing People and their Machines

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Volition-guarded multiagent atomic transactions decompose agents into person volitions plus machine state, enabling formal specs and proofs that social networks and coins/bonds are volitionally grassroots under a new ...

  2. Volition Elicitation: Operational Semantics for People and Their Machines

    cs.PL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    vGLP extends GLP so that program reductions can be guarded by a person's expressed volition, with the UI derived from the semantics and correctness proofs for soundness, liveness, and compilation.

  3. GLP: A Grassroots, Multiagent, Concurrent, Logic Programming Language for AI (Full Version)

    cs.PL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GLP is a logic programming language whose single-reader/single-writer variables give secure channels, with proofs that multiagent GLP computations are deductions and that multiagent GLP is a grassroots protocol.

  4. GLP: A Grassroots, Multiagent, Concurrent, Logic Programming Language for AI

    cs.PL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GLP is a single-assignment concurrent logic language whose multiagent semantics is claimed to guarantee that any program using cold-calls yields a grassroots platform, with the proof deferred to the full paper.

Pith tools