Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A fine-grained, versatile index of remoteness to characterize place-level rurality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.08496 v1 pith:VZR4QQKH submitted 2022-02-17 stat.AP

classification stat.AP
keywords rural-urbanplace-levelindexremotenessclassificationsdataexistingfine-grained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Rural-urban classifications are essential for analyzing geographic, demographic, environmental, or socioeconomic processes across the rural-urban continuum. However, existing county-level classifications may ignore the within-county variations of rurality, which can be problematic if the scale of interest is at the place-level or finer. Moreover, existing rural-urban classification are often inconsistent over time and thus, impede the long-term analysis of rural-urban dynamics. We developed a distance-based method to generate place-level remoteness estimates based on simple input data. We create our remoteness index based on place-level population data for the U.S. from 1980 to 2010. The proposed index is generalizable to data-scarce environments and earlier time periods and is based on the distances of a given place to the nearest places of different population sizes, and allows for fine-grained, temporally consistent analyses of rural-urban processes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools