Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Beer Optimisation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.02752 v2 pith:JVF3G745 submitted 2022-04-06 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords beerevolutionarymulti-objectiveoptimisationproductionpropertiesapproachescriteria
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Food production is a complex process which can benefit from many optimisation approaches. However, there is growing interest in methods that support customisation of food properties to satisfy individual consumer preferences. This paper addresses the personalisation of beer properties. Having identified components of the production process for craft beers whose production tends to be less standardised, we introduce a system which enables brewers to map the desired beer properties into ingredients dosage and combination. Previously explored approaches include direct use of structural equations as well as global machine learning methods. We introduce a framework which uses an evolutionary method supporting multi-objective optimisation. This work identifies problem-dependent objectives, their associations, and proposes a workflow to automate the discovery of multiple novel recipes based on user-defined criteria. The quality of the solutions generated by the multi-objective optimiser is compared against solutions from multiple runs of the method, and those of a single objective evolutionary technique. This comparison provides a road-map allowing the users to choose among more varied options or to fine-tune one of the favourite identified solution. The experiments presented here demonstrate the usability of the framework as well as the transparency of its criteria.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools